Index for "5th edition, Chapter 2"
The concept of “civil rights and obligations”
cannot be interpreted solely by reference to the
domestic law of the respondent State: Leela
Förderkreis E.V. and Others v. Germany [2009] 49
EHRR5.
In the fifth edition of our book, Disciplinary
and Regulatory Proceedings we offered the comment
that, ‘It is somewhat difficult for an English
lawyer to comprehend that the outcome of
proceedings c...
As to the sufficiency of judicial review to
correct a non-conformable decision at first
instance, the case of Bryan v The United Kingdom
(1995) 21 EHRR 342 was distinguished in the
case of Tsfayo v. t...
The Society of Lloyds is not a public
authority for the purposes of section 6 of the
Human Rights Act 1998: Doll-Steinberg v Society
of Lloyd’s
[2002] EWHC 419 (Admin).
So far as the Convention right to a fair and
public hearing within a reasonable time is
concerned, the reasonableness of the length of
proceedings is to be assessed in the light of the
particular circ...
