Index for "chapter 18"
The opening words of section 36A(1) (of the
Medical Act 1983, as inserted) make it clear
that it is the standard of the past professional
performance of the practitioner in the work which
he has actua...
Rashid v. General Medical Council, Fatani v.
GMC
(2007) 1 WLR 1460 -- 4. These two appeals from
the GMC Fitness to Practice Panel reaffirmed the
principal purpose of the Panel namely the
preservation ...
The approach of the High Court to reviewing
sanctions imposed by the Fitness to Practice Panel
of the GMC were summarized by Laws LJ (with whom
Chadwick LJ and Sir Peter Gibson agreed), in the
case of...
In the case of an interim order against a
doctor, Article 6 of the ECHR is not normally
engaged. All that is required is that the tribunal
acts speedily and on the basis of credible
evidence. R (on th...
General Medical Council v. Hiew
[2007] 1 WLR 2007 -- 1. This case before the
Court of Appeal considered the criteria for the
exercise of the powers to extend interim suspension
order made by the GMC�...
To the extent that they decided that evidence
exclusively relevant to personal mitigation could
be considered by the Committee when deciding
whether serious professional misconduct was proved,
the dec...
In the case of Biswas, R (on the application
of) v The General Medical Council
[2007] EWHC 1644 (Admin) Gibbs J. held that
‘The question of what is serious or not in the
context of medical practice ...
The following statement was approved by Burton
J in Woods v GMC [2002] EWHC 1484: ‘In conduct
cases the PPC's task is to decide whether, in its
opinion, there is a real prospect of serious
professio...
In Selvarajan v General Medical Council
[2008] EWHC 182 (Admin) Blake J. held that: --
the passage of time at common law and unreasonable
delay in prosecuting proceedings for the purpose of
Article 6 ...