<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
 <title>Regulatory Law</title>
 <description>The latest updates from regulatorylaw.co.uk, a free resource for practitioners representing clients before disciplinary tribunals</description>
 <link>http://regulatorylaw.co.uk</link>
 <ttl>60</ttl>
 <atom:link href="http://regulatorylaw.co.uk/rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

    <item>
        <title>Composition of tribunal</title>
        <link>http://regulatorylaw.co.uk/Composition_of_tribunal.html</link>
        <guid>http://regulatorylaw.co.uk/Composition_of_tribunal.html#2012-05-16T13:16:41.184Z</guid>
        <pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 13:16:41 GMT</pubDate>
        <description>The Northern Ireland High Court upheld a finding of a Conduct and Competence Committee of the Nursing and Midwifery Council after the complainant had argued that whilst dismissing two charges based on...</description>
    </item>


    <item>
        <title>'Contestation'</title>
        <link>http://regulatorylaw.co.uk/%27Contestation%27.html</link>
        <guid>http://regulatorylaw.co.uk/%27Contestation%27.html#2012-05-15T09:21:34.648Z</guid>
        <pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 09:21:34 GMT</pubDate>
        <description>In the case of Boulois v Luxembourg [2012[ application 37575/04, the ECtHR gave the following guidance on the scope of Article 6(i): -- For Article 6 (i) in its “civil” limb to be applicable, ther...</description>
    </item>


    <item>
        <title>Anonymity</title>
        <link>http://regulatorylaw.co.uk/Anonymity.html</link>
        <guid>http://regulatorylaw.co.uk/Anonymity.html#2012-05-10T11:25:54.841Z</guid>
        <pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 11:25:54 GMT</pubDate>
        <description>The principles to be applied where anonymity is sought for the name or particulars of someone involved in open justice proceedings were summarised as follows by Lord Neuberger MR as follows: -- (1) Th...</description>
    </item>


    <item>
        <title>Sanctions of a foreign regulator</title>
        <link>http://regulatorylaw.co.uk/Sanctions_of_a_foreign_regulator.html</link>
        <guid>http://regulatorylaw.co.uk/Sanctions_of_a_foreign_regulator.html#2012-05-01T10:23:09.773Z</guid>
        <pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 10:23:09 GMT</pubDate>
        <description>The Administrative Court has held that the General Medical Council's Fitness to Practise Panel did not need to give reasons for imposing a sanction against Dr A which was more onerous than that impose...</description>
    </item>


    <item>
        <title>The composition of disciplinary tribunals</title>
        <link>http://regulatorylaw.co.uk/The_composition_of_disciplinary_tribunals.html</link>
        <guid>http://regulatorylaw.co.uk/The_composition_of_disciplinary_tribunals.html#2012-04-20T08:40:48.456Z</guid>
        <pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2012 08:40:48 GMT</pubDate>
        <description>A recent decision of the Court of Appeal is of considerable significance as to the composition of professional disciplinary tribunals. -- In the case of Kaur, R (on the application of) v Institute of ...</description>
    </item>


    <item>
        <title>Appeals from FTP panels</title>
        <link>http://regulatorylaw.co.uk/Appeals_from_FTP_panels.html</link>
        <guid>http://regulatorylaw.co.uk/Appeals_from_FTP_panels.html#2012-04-20T08:19:10.222Z</guid>
        <pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2012 08:19:10 GMT</pubDate>
        <description>The introduction of lay members on to GMC Panels did not justify a more interventionist role by Judges, nor did it justify a departure from long established principles on the proper approach to appeal...</description>
    </item>


    <item>
        <title>Apparent bias</title>
        <link>http://regulatorylaw.co.uk/Apparent_bias.html</link>
        <guid>http://regulatorylaw.co.uk/Apparent_bias.html#2012-04-19T17:53:09.811Z</guid>
        <pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 17:53:09 GMT</pubDate>
        <description>Members of regulatory bodies may have different roles, including membership of the council or a committee which draws up a code of conduct and membership of a disciplinary committee. To what extent ar...</description>
    </item>


    <item>
        <title>Sanctions by EC regulators</title>
        <link>http://regulatorylaw.co.uk/Sanctions_by_EC_regulators.html</link>
        <guid>http://regulatorylaw.co.uk/Sanctions_by_EC_regulators.html#2012-04-19T10:55:23.516Z</guid>
        <pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 10:55:23 GMT</pubDate>
        <description>Her Honour Judge Belcher, sitting as a High Court judge, held that: -- 1. It is not necessary for the Fitness to Practise Panel of the General Medical Council to specify reasons for imposing a decisio...</description>
    </item>


    <item>
        <title>Appeals following acquittals</title>
        <link>http://regulatorylaw.co.uk/Appeals_following_acquittals.html</link>
        <guid>http://regulatorylaw.co.uk/Appeals_following_acquittals.html#2012-04-17T16:07:54.423Z</guid>
        <pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 16:07:54 GMT</pubDate>
        <description>In the case of Bhatt v General Medical Council [2011] EWHC 783 (Admin) Mr Justice Langstaff had to deal with a doctor who had been acquitted by the Crown Court of seven counts of sexual assault agains...</description>
    </item>


    <item>
        <title>Dishonesty</title>
        <link>http://regulatorylaw.co.uk/Dishonesty.html</link>
        <guid>http://regulatorylaw.co.uk/Dishonesty.html#2012-04-10T14:53:17.834Z</guid>
        <pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 14:53:17 GMT</pubDate>
        <description>Although it embodies no important new statement of principle the case of Solicitors Regulation Authority v Lawrence &amp; Anor [2012] EWCA Civ 421 is an illustration of the circumstances in which the Cour...</description>
    </item>


    <item>
        <title>Faced with disciplinary proceedings?</title>
        <link>http://regulatorylaw.co.uk/Faced_with_disciplinary_proceedings%3F.html</link>
        <guid>http://regulatorylaw.co.uk/Faced_with_disciplinary_proceedings%3F.html#2012-04-04T13:57:07.537Z</guid>
        <pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 13:57:07 GMT</pubDate>
        <description>A guide for non-lawyers -- It can happen to anyone. There are few of us who at some time or another in our career are not the subject of a complaint to our professional body or regulator (both called ...</description>
    </item>


    <item>
        <title>index</title>
        <link>http://regulatorylaw.co.uk/index.html</link>
        <guid>http://regulatorylaw.co.uk/index.html#2012-04-04T08:30:04.158Z</guid>
        <pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 08:30:04 GMT</pubDate>
        <description>What's new -- About this site -- This site is a free resource for practitioners representing clients -- before disciplinary tribunals and for lawyers practising or advising -- in any regulatory area. ...</description>
    </item>


    <item>
        <title>Qualified privilege</title>
        <link>http://regulatorylaw.co.uk/Qualified_privilege.html</link>
        <guid>http://regulatorylaw.co.uk/Qualified_privilege.html#2012-03-26T08:45:35.464Z</guid>
        <pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2012 08:45:35 GMT</pubDate>
        <description>Reynolds privilege exists where the public interest justifies publication notwithstanding that this carries the risk of defaming an individual who will have no remedy. This requires a balance to be st...</description>
    </item>


    <item>
        <title>Fitness to practise panel criticized</title>
        <link>http://regulatorylaw.co.uk/Fitness_to_practise_panel_criticized.html</link>
        <guid>http://regulatorylaw.co.uk/Fitness_to_practise_panel_criticized.html#2012-03-13T18:21:01.469Z</guid>
        <pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2012 18:21:01 GMT</pubDate>
        <description>‘Inadequate and superficial reasoning’ -- Serious criticism of the GMC Fitness to Practise panel when working under the former rules was made by Mitting J in the Queen’s Bench Division recently ...</description>
    </item>


    <item>
        <title>Independence and impartiality</title>
        <link>http://regulatorylaw.co.uk/Independence_and_impartiality.html</link>
        <guid>http://regulatorylaw.co.uk/Independence_and_impartiality.html#2012-02-29T14:46:18.682Z</guid>
        <pubDate>Wed, 29 Feb 2012 14:46:18 GMT</pubDate>
        <description>The principles of independence and impartiality were restated by the ECtHR as follows: -- The Court recalls that in determining whether a body can be considered as “independent” – notably of the...</description>
    </item>


    <item>
        <title>Contractual jurisdiction</title>
        <link>http://regulatorylaw.co.uk/Contractual_jurisdiction.html</link>
        <guid>http://regulatorylaw.co.uk/Contractual_jurisdiction.html#2012-02-28T14:57:30.025Z</guid>
        <pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 14:57:30 GMT</pubDate>
        <description>In the case of Hussain v Surrey and Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust [2011] EWHC 1670 (QB Andrew Smith J said, -- i) The importance of the provision to the contractual working relationship between the empl...</description>
    </item>


    <item>
        <title>Newton hearings</title>
        <link>http://regulatorylaw.co.uk/Newton_hearings.html</link>
        <guid>http://regulatorylaw.co.uk/Newton_hearings.html#2012-02-20T12:45:56.023Z</guid>
        <pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 12:45:56 GMT</pubDate>
        <description>‘Procedurally, it is imperative that the Tribunal does not proceed to sanctioning before having decided upon and announced the basis of its findings on the substantive allegations. As a general prin...</description>
    </item>


    <item>
        <title>Deeming clauses</title>
        <link>http://regulatorylaw.co.uk/Deeming_clauses.html</link>
        <guid>http://regulatorylaw.co.uk/Deeming_clauses.html#2012-02-09T18:24:07.284Z</guid>
        <pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 18:24:07 GMT</pubDate>
        <description>Short cuts in disciplinary charging and the long road to the Supreme Court -- R (On the application of COKE-WALLIS) -- -v- -- INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS IN -- ENGLAND AND WALES [2011] UKSC 1 (...</description>
    </item>


    <item>
        <title>Fitness to practise</title>
        <link>http://regulatorylaw.co.uk/Fitness_to_practise.html</link>
        <guid>http://regulatorylaw.co.uk/Fitness_to_practise.html#2012-01-21T11:27:31.791Z</guid>
        <pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 11:27:31 GMT</pubDate>
        <description>Mrs Justice Cox recently drew attention to the ‘helpful and comprehensive approach to determining a doctor’s fitness to practise formulated by Dame Janet Smith in her Fifth Report from Shipman . A...</description>
    </item>

</channel>
</rss>
<!-- generated on demand in 0.047 seconds: hostname is 'regulatorylaw.co.uk' -->

