<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
 <title>Regulatory Law</title>
 <description>The latest updates from regulatorylaw.co.uk, a free resource for practitioners representing clients before disciplinary tribunals</description>
 <link>http://regulatorylaw.co.uk</link>
 <ttl>60</ttl>
 <atom:link href="http://regulatorylaw.co.uk/rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

    <item>
        <title>Freedom of expression</title>
        <link>http://regulatorylaw.co.uk/Freedom_of_expression.html</link>
        <guid>http://regulatorylaw.co.uk/Freedom_of_expression#2008-07-04T10:55:41.475Z</guid>
        <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 10:55:41 GMT</pubDate>
        <description>The scope of the right to freedom of expression under Article 10 of the European Convention were comprehensively reviewed by the Court in the case of Kulis v Poland - 15601/02 [2008] ECHR 210. -- … ...</description>
    </item>


    <item>
        <title>index</title>
        <link>http://regulatorylaw.co.uk/index.html</link>
        <guid>http://regulatorylaw.co.uk/index#2008-07-04T10:54:15.409Z</guid>
        <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 10:54:15 GMT</pubDate>
        <description>About this site -- This site is a free resource for practitioners representing clients -- before disciplinary tribunals and for lawyers practising or advising -- in any regulatory area. -- It is based...</description>
    </item>


    <item>
        <title>Bar Standards Board</title>
        <link>http://regulatorylaw.co.uk/Bar_Standards_Board.html</link>
        <guid>http://regulatorylaw.co.uk/Bar_Standards_Board#2008-06-19T07:56:38.074Z</guid>
        <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 07:56:38 GMT</pubDate>
        <description>Bar Standards Board - the future of the Bar's complaints and disciplinary processes -- The Bar Standards Board was established in January 2006 as a result of the Bar Council separating its regulatory ...</description>
    </item>


    <item>
        <title>AADB</title>
        <link>http://regulatorylaw.co.uk/AADB.html</link>
        <guid>http://regulatorylaw.co.uk/AADB#2008-06-16T16:09:56.308Z</guid>
        <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 16:09:56 GMT</pubDate>
        <description>Accountancy &amp; Actuarial Discipline Board: Efficient and effective changes to Disciplinary arrangements -- The Accountancy &amp; Actuarial Discipline Board (&quot;AADB&quot;) is the independent, investigative and di...</description>
    </item>


    <item>
        <title>Costs in disciplinary proceedings</title>
        <link>http://regulatorylaw.co.uk/Costs_in_disciplinary_proceedings.html</link>
        <guid>http://regulatorylaw.co.uk/Costs_in_disciplinary_proceedings#2008-06-05T08:06:18.689Z</guid>
        <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 08:06:18 GMT</pubDate>
        <description>The proper approach to the award of costs for proceedings before the Disciplinary Committee of the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons and other professional bodies was summarised by the Judicial Com...</description>
    </item>


    <item>
        <title>Chapter 4: By what professional standard is bad work to be judged?</title>
        <link>http://regulatorylaw.co.uk/Chapter_4%3A_By_what_professional_standard_is_bad_work_to_be_judged%3F.html</link>
        <guid>http://regulatorylaw.co.uk/Chapter_4%3A_By_what_professional_standard_is_bad_work_to_be_judged%3F#2008-06-05T07:49:32.900Z</guid>
        <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 07:49:32 GMT</pubDate>
        <description>It has been held that the standard to be expected of a doctor is ‘that applicable to the post to which he was appointed and the work he was carrying out.’ Holton v General Medical Council [2006] E...</description>
    </item>


    <item>
        <title>Vagueness in charge</title>
        <link>http://regulatorylaw.co.uk/Vagueness_in_charge.html</link>
        <guid>http://regulatorylaw.co.uk/Vagueness_in_charge#2008-05-28T09:04:54.984Z</guid>
        <pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 09:04:54 GMT</pubDate>
        <description>‘In my judgment, duplicity is not a basis for interfering with a disciplinary finding ..., although of course it may be relevant to the fairness of the proceedings and to the ultimate penalty if cha...</description>
    </item>


    <item>
        <title>Office of the Independent Adjudicator for Higher Education</title>
        <link>http://regulatorylaw.co.uk/Office_of_the_Independent_Adjudicator_for_Higher_Education.html</link>
        <guid>http://regulatorylaw.co.uk/Office_of_the_Independent_Adjudicator_for_Higher_Education#2008-05-28T09:01:02.513Z</guid>
        <pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 09:01:02 GMT</pubDate>
        <description>Under the Higher Education Act 2004 the Office of the Independent Adjudicator for Higher Education (OIA) has been designated the body responsible for dealing with student complaints. The purpose of th...</description>
    </item>


    <item>
        <title>Dishonesty in Disciplinary Proceedings</title>
        <link>http://regulatorylaw.co.uk/Dishonesty_in_Disciplinary_Proceedings.html</link>
        <guid>http://regulatorylaw.co.uk/Dishonesty_in_Disciplinary_Proceedings#2008-05-28T08:58:30.761Z</guid>
        <pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 08:58:30 GMT</pubDate>
        <description>The decision of the Court of Appeal in Bultitude (Bultitude v Law Society [2004] EWCA Civ 1853) stands as binding authority that the test to be applied in the context of solicitors' disciplinary proce...</description>
    </item>


    <item>
        <title>Teaching Council Rule</title>
        <link>http://regulatorylaw.co.uk/Teaching_Council_Rule.html</link>
        <guid>http://regulatorylaw.co.uk/Teaching_Council_Rule#2008-04-15T15:50:04.365Z</guid>
        <pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 15:50:04 GMT</pubDate>
        <description>'I cannot see any reason why, in these circumstances, a breach of the Rules, a failure by the Council to observe the Rules, which it has publicly proclaimed as the basis upon which it, a public body, ...</description>
    </item>


    <item>
        <title>Hearsay evidence</title>
        <link>http://regulatorylaw.co.uk/Hearsay_evidence.html</link>
        <guid>http://regulatorylaw.co.uk/Hearsay_evidence#2008-03-30T10:15:32.541Z</guid>
        <pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 10:15:32 GMT</pubDate>
        <description>A power to admit hearsay evidence in disciplinary proceedings is not necessarily incompatible with The European Convention on Human Rights. -- Article 6(3) of the Convention provides that ‘everyone ...</description>
    </item>


    <item>
        <title>The overriding objective of a fair trial</title>
        <link>http://regulatorylaw.co.uk/The_overriding_objective_of_a_fair_trial.html</link>
        <guid>http://regulatorylaw.co.uk/The_overriding_objective_of_a_fair_trial#2008-03-26T10:46:56.458Z</guid>
        <pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 10:46:56 GMT</pubDate>
        <description>It is suggested that the following dictum of Treacy J in Robinson v Abergavenny Magistrates' Court [2007] EWHC 2005 (Admin) should be regarded as of equal application to disciplinary proceedings, exce...</description>
    </item>


    <item>
        <title>Prosecutor's liability to costs</title>
        <link>http://regulatorylaw.co.uk/Prosecutor%27s_liability_to_costs.html</link>
        <guid>http://regulatorylaw.co.uk/Prosecutor%27s_liability_to_costs#2008-03-10T09:49:21.355Z</guid>
        <pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 09:49:21 GMT</pubDate>
        <description>Held: a prosecuting authority’s immunity from a costs award made against it may violate Article 6(1) where it puts a party to civil proceedings at an undue disadvantage vis-à-vis the prosecuting au...</description>
    </item>


    <item>
        <title>Retrospective legislation</title>
        <link>http://regulatorylaw.co.uk/Retrospective_legislation.html</link>
        <guid>http://regulatorylaw.co.uk/Retrospective_legislation#2008-03-10T09:34:26.672Z</guid>
        <pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 09:34:26 GMT</pubDate>
        <description>Held: a statute of 1994 which laid down a stricter punishment for those convicted of a serious offence that had a previous conviction for a serious offence (even one committed prior to 1994) did not o...</description>
    </item>


    <item>
        <title>The need for evidence in adversarial proceedings</title>
        <link>http://regulatorylaw.co.uk/The_need_for_evidence_in_adversarial_proceedings.html</link>
        <guid>http://regulatorylaw.co.uk/The_need_for_evidence_in_adversarial_proceedings#2008-03-10T09:32:11.021Z</guid>
        <pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 09:32:11 GMT</pubDate>
        <description>Held: one of the elements of a fair hearing in criminal proceedings was the right to adversarial proceedings. Each party had to have the opportunity not only to make known any evidence needed for his ...</description>
    </item>


    <item>
        <title>The need for adversarial proceedings</title>
        <link>http://regulatorylaw.co.uk/The_need_for_adversarial_proceedings.html</link>
        <guid>http://regulatorylaw.co.uk/The_need_for_adversarial_proceedings#2008-03-10T09:29:43.828Z</guid>
        <pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 09:29:43 GMT</pubDate>
        <description></description>
    </item>


    <item>
        <title>Public hearings: the overarching principle</title>
        <link>http://regulatorylaw.co.uk/Public_hearings%3A_the_overarching_principle.html</link>
        <guid>http://regulatorylaw.co.uk/Public_hearings%3A_the_overarching_principle#2008-03-10T09:28:22.378Z</guid>
        <pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 09:28:22 GMT</pubDate>
        <description>Held: the principle of an oral and public hearing was particularly important in the criminal context. The obligation to hold a hearing was not, however, absolute. There could be proceedings in which a...</description>
    </item>


    <item>
        <title>Double jeopardy</title>
        <link>http://regulatorylaw.co.uk/Double_jeopardy.html</link>
        <guid>http://regulatorylaw.co.uk/Double_jeopardy#2008-02-28T11:52:26.374Z</guid>
        <pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 11:52:26 GMT</pubDate>
        <description>‘The absence of any common law double jeopardy rule in professional misconduct proceedings was specifically noted in the case of R v Statutory Committee of the Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britai...</description>
    </item>


    <item>
        <title>'The Twinsectra test'</title>
        <link>http://regulatorylaw.co.uk/%27The_Twinsectra_test%27.html</link>
        <guid>http://regulatorylaw.co.uk/%27The_Twinsectra_test%27#2008-02-20T09:40:29.352Z</guid>
        <pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 09:40:29 GMT</pubDate>
        <description>In the case of Twinsectra Ltd v Yardley [2002] 2 AC 164 Lord Hutton said that ‘(Their) Lordships should state that dishonesty requires knowledge by the defendant that what he was doing would be rega...</description>
    </item>


    <item>
        <title>Qualified privilege in reports</title>
        <link>http://regulatorylaw.co.uk/Qualified_privilege_in_reports.html</link>
        <guid>http://regulatorylaw.co.uk/Qualified_privilege_in_reports#2008-02-15T12:28:45.414Z</guid>
        <pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 12:28:45 GMT</pubDate>
        <description>The defence of qualified privilege … is still in the process of development: Seaga v. Harper (Jamaica) [2008] UKPC 9, in which it was said that the decision in Reynolds v. Times Newspapers Ltd and O...</description>
    </item>

</channel>
</rss>
<!-- generated on demand in 0.133 seconds: hostname is 'regulatorylaw.co.uk' -->
